Section Policies

Articles

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

Publication Ethics

JOURNAL PUBLISHER CODE ETHICS

1. Determining the name of the journal, the scope of science, the timeline, and the accreditation.
2. Determining the membership of the editorial board.
3. Defining the relationship between publishers, editors, peer review, and other parties in the contract.
4. Appreciating the confidentiality of the contributing researchers, author, editor, and peer review.
5. Applying the norms and regulations regarding intellectual property rights especially on copyrights.
6. Conducting the policy reviews on the journals and present it to the authors, editorial board, peer review, and readers.
7. Making the behavior code guidelines for editor and peer review.
8. Publishing journals on a regular basis.
9. Ensuring the availability of resources for sustainability journal publishing.
10. Establishing cooperation and marketing network.
11. Preparing for the licensing and other legal aspects.

EDITOR CODE ETHICS

1. Improving the quality of publications.
2. Ensuring the process to maintain the quality of published papers.
3. Leading the freedom in delivering an opinion.
4. Maintaining the integrity of the author's academic track record.
5. Conveying corrections, clarifications, withdrawal, and an apology if necessary.
6. Owning the responsibility for styling and formatting the paper, while the contents and any statements in the paper are the responsibility of the authors.                                                          
7. Assessing policies and attitudes of the published journal from the author and peer review to increase responsibility and minimize errors.
8. Having an open-minded personality in accepting the new opinion or views of others who are different than their personal opinion.               
9. Prohibiting in defending our own opinion, the author or third parties which may result in a false decision.
10. Encouraging the author, in order to make improvements to the paper until it worth publishing.

PEER REVIEWER CODE ETHIC

1. Receiving the task from the editors to review the papers and submit the review to the editor, as a matter of determining the feasibility of the paper for publication.
2. Reviewing the papers in a timely manner (on time) in accordance with the style guide based on scientific principles (method of data collection, the legality of the author, conclusions, etc.).
3. Reviewing the papers that have been corrected in accordance with the standards.
4. Encouraging the author to make improvements in the papers by providing feedback, suggestions, feedback, and recommendations.
5. Maintaining the author's privacy by covering the results of the corrections, suggestions, and recommendations received by the author.
6. Reviewers must not review any papers that involve the reviewers in their work, directly or indirectly.
7. Following the guidelines for peer review in reviewing papers and assessing the evaluation form paper given by the editors.
8. Reviewing papers substantively by not correcting the grammar, punctuation, and mistype.
9. Ensuring the principles of truth, novelty, and originality; prioritize the benefit of the paper for the development of science, technology, and innovation; also comprehending the impact on the development of science writing. 
10. Prohibiting in defending own opinion, the author or third parties which may result in decision reference becoming non-objective.                                                                       
11. Upholding the value of objectivity and free from any influences.                                  
12. Ensuring the confidentiality of findings in the paper until it is published.                                
13. Having a broad understanding of the expertise and ability to provide a review of the paper appropriately and correctly.
14. Refusing to do a review of the research is not from the field of expertise. Instead, the peer review should be giving the recommendation to the researcher if there is any other expert on the subjects.  
15. Having an open-minded personality in accepting the new opinion or views of others who are different than their personal opinion.
16. Refusing to do the review if the deadline given by the editor cannot be reached. If absent the peer review should notify the editor as early as possible.      
17. The results of the review must be presented in an honest, objective, and supported by clear arguments. Some possible recommendations from the review are (a) Accepted without repair; (b) Accepted with minor repairs (after repaired by the author, it is not necessary to go to peer review); (c) Accepted with major repairs (after repaired by the author, return to the peer review for re-review); (d) Rejected and recommended for other publication; or (e) Rejected and recommended not to publish to any publication because scientifically the paper is flawed for the community.
18. Giving rejection for the last recommendation as to the last choice related to the feasibility of the papers or with an indication of severe violations of the code of ethics related to the author.
19. Reviewed papers aren’t allowed to be used for personal or third-party interests. Moreover, The use of some of the contents of the reviewed papers must have received permission from the author.

AUTHOR/ARTICLE WRITER CODE ETHICS

1. Author collectively responsible for the work and the content of the article which cover methods, analysis, calculation, and details.
2. The author immediately responds to the comments made by the peer review professionally and timely.
3. The author should inform the editor if they retract their paper.         
4. The author describes the limitations of the study.                        
5. The author respects the publishers if they demand not to publish the findings in the form of interviews or through any other media before the publication.
6. The author informs the editor of (a) paper that is part of a phased research, multidisciplinary, and different perspectives.                                  
7. The author makes a statement that the papers submitted for publication are original, have not been published anywhere in any language, and not in the process of submission to another publisher.
8. If there is an error in the paper, the author should immediately notify the editor or publisher.                                        
9. The use of materials from other publications that are copyrighted should be given written permission and gratitude.
10. The author refers to the work of others as appropriate in citations and quotations used in the paper.                                           
11. When delivering new discoveries or improving inventions the authors should mention the job previous researcher/writer/founder.                                    
12. The author is not allowed to give a bibliography of the publications if they do not read the publication.                                 
13. If requested, the authors prepared the proof that the research has already met the requirements of the research ethics including the field notes.
14. The author adequately responds if there are any comments or feedback after the paper published.

Author Guidelines

Peer Review Process

JSSE (Journal of Social Science in Education) will initially have the Editor-in-Chief to screen the submitted manuscripts. Then, the papers will be distributed to the editorial boards based on their field of expertise.

Desk Review. The papers will undergo desk review where those will be read and screened by the editorial board members to ensure that they have met the writing guideline, focus, and scope with excellent academic quality. If they do not meet the conditions, the author will be given the opportunity to revise their manuscript according to the given criteria. However, there is also the possibility that the manuscript will be directly rejected.

JSSE (Journal of Social Science in Education) operates a double-blind reviewing policy in which the reviewer's name is always concealed from the submitting author and vice versa. The manuscripts will be sent to a peer-reviewer based on their field of expertise. JSSE (Journal of Social Science in Education) provides a review form for the reviewer to give their assesments which includes originality, clarity, contribution to the field and scope, as well as language and stucture. Then editorial board will make a decision upon the reviewer comments or advice. The decisions include:

1.     Accepted, as it can be published directly

2.     Accepted with Minor Revisions (let author revised with a specified time limit)

3.     Accepted with Major Revisions (let author revised with a specified time limit)

4.     Rejected, as it can be re-evaluted after revision (generally, the manuscript is out of the scope of Community Empowerment Journal Of Economic and Business, major technical problems, clarity of contents and presentation)

To check the plagiarism, JSSE (Journal of Social Science in Education) will do the screening by using Turnitin. The limit of percentage of a manuscript must be 20%. If it is found plagiarism indication, the editorial board may reject the manuscripts immediately (but the writer may resubmit it after revision) or set a limited time for author(s) to revise the manuscript.

Normal turn-around time for evaluation of manuscripts is four to six months between January-June (for the first edition) and July-December (for the second edition).

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

Copyright Transfer Agreement

In the event that a manuscript is accepted for publication, the author must relinquish copyright to the Community Empowerment Journal Of Economic and Business, Borneo Research Education, in its capacity as the journal's publisher.The Editorial Board employs stringent measures to ensure the absence of false or misleading data, opinions, or statements within the journal. However, the content of published articles and advertisements remains the exclusive responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.

To initiate this process, authors and advertisers are required to complete and sign the Copyright Transfer Agreement Form, which must be submitted in either hard copy or soft copy format. The hard copy of the form must be sent to the Editorial Office, while the soft copy must be attached to an email addressed to borneorec@gmail.com.

Policy of Screening for Plagiarism

To avoid plagiarism, all submissions are screened using Turnitin before undergoing the review processes.

Plagiarism-free works should match these requirements:

 1. Writing that quoting writings of others (by quoting indirectly) that has been well paraphrased, by making one’s own words, instead of performing copy and paste or typing the original source word-by-word, and write down the reading sources according to the rules of scientific writing.

2.  Writing with direct quotation, by quoting the exact same words as the original writings should apply quotation marks (for writing that less than 40 words), or if the quote consists of over than 40 words, the paragraphs should be notched and applies different font size.

3. Mentioning the original source other people's ideas that is being used, whether from published or unpublished writing, both from oral or written source, in any form of media

4. The result of plagiarism percentage of a manuscript is limited to 20%. If it is found plagiarism indication, the editorial board will reject the manuscripts immediately (but the writer may resubmit it after revision).

Author(s) Fee

A. Article Submission Charge

Article Submission Fee : IDR 0 

B. Article Processing Charge

Article Publication & Processing: IDR 0

If this paper is accepted for publication by the Editorial Board, we will send you a Letter of Acceptance along with the payment notice which informs the payment information. The Article Publication Fee is to cover publications costs. The payment must be made within the period stated in the payment notice. The article will not be published until the payment is made. 

C. Waiver Policy

The Editorial Board may waive the publication fees upon request of the authors. The Editorial Board will consider such a request on an individual basis. If you need a waiver on publication fees, please state the reasons and send your request to the Editorial Board.

Indexing and Abstracting

JSSE (Journal of Social Science in Education) has been indexed and abstracted by:

• Google Scholar
• Dimesions

Journal History

JSSE (Journal of Social Science in Education) is a leading journal in social science institutions focusing on social studies and education. The journal is multidisciplinary, accepting contributions that advance the understanding of education, science, and technology as social activities. JSSE promotes scholarly research and discussion on social studies and education in a variety of academic institutional contexts, including those related to wetlands. The journal emphasizes scientific advances in understanding the complex interactions between society, education, and wetland environments.

Contact Us

INDEXING:

Journal of Social Sciences in Education by Borneo Riset Edukasi is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International